Cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf

22.12.2018 4 By Gozilkree

cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf

Such continuously operated furnaces are equipped with tuyere and shell cooling. Cokeless cupola produces low carbon, low sulphur iron. The cokeless cupola. The various melting techniques viz., Electric Arc Furnace, Plasma-Arc Furnace, Laser . OPERATION OF A GAS-FIRED COKE-LESS CUPOLA FURNACE. A Cost Effective and Environment Friendly Melting Furnace. Introduction. The original cokeless cupola was invented by Mr. Richard Thomas Taft,. Managing The cupola is operated with partially reducing conditions. It is very important that. The Cupola furnace with hot blast generation has by special process technology with complete The cokeless cupola was built several times in the early. This is the principal type of furnace used in the steelmaking process. Electric-arc . dry filter. OPERATION OF A GAS-FIRED COKE-LESS CUPOLA FURNACE. cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf

Related videos

INDUCTION FURNACE WORKING

This invention relates to metal-melting furnaces, in particular cokeless cupola furnaces, and is concerned with control of the slag. In the conventional coke-fired cupola furnace the importance of slag control is recognised and the mechanism is fairly well understood. Additionally during melting some oxidation of the metal itself and of other components present may occur, and this likewise results in materials which must be absorbed into a suitable slag so that the furnace can be operated easily.

The primary function of the slag is therefore to absorb the ash in the coke and other impurities in the charge. In addition most cupola furnaces are lined with a refractory material and as this gradually wears away this material must also be absorbed into the slag.

This is the purpose of the addition of limestone to the charge in the furnace; the limestone acts as a flux to absorb all these unwanted materials and form a slag which can be easily removed from the furnace and handled outside. Joy photoshop cs5 a coke-fired cupola cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf is important that the carbon in the coke should be easily released from the coke so that it can act both as a fuel, generating the necessary heat, and as a source of carbon for the metal, primarily where the metal is iron or a ferrous alloy.

The limestone absorbs the ash into the slag and leaves the carbon exposed for these two functions. It is sometimes necessary to add further materials such as a fluorspar which makes the slag more reactive to the ash so that both better carbon pick-up and better temperatures in the furnace can be obtained.

The whole question of fluxing agents is not so well understood, nor its importance appreciated, in cokeless cupolas. We have discovered that slag control is essential to the correct operation of a cokeless cupola as opposed to being of minor importance as was previously felt. In the cokeless cupola a flux or slag is still required for some of the same reasons as in a coke-fired cupola, but there are some major differences.

There is no ash to flux, so one of the main reasons for adding a flux has been eliminated. However there is still dirt in the charge and sand cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf to the returns, and so these materials still have to be converted into a fluid slag. The oxidation losses are lower than in a coke-fired furnaces so again, from this aspect, less flux is required. At the same time, flux is still necessary to absorb the material originating from wear of the furnace lining and whilst in some cases a similar lining is used and the action is therefore similar, the actual lining consumption is much less, so here again there is a difference resulting in a lower need for a flux.

Moreover in many instances the cokeless cupola is operated as a long-campaign furnace as this is a more energy-efficient method of operation than a series of short runs and it forms an important part of the way the furnace is used.

In this case high-alumina linings are often employed and this alumina has to be absorbed into the slag as the lining wears. This too cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf to using as little fluxing agent as possible so as to produce the minimum of slag. At present in the rare occasions that the operator of a cokeless cupola considers how much fluxing agent to add his instinct from working with coke cupolas where the precise amount of fluxing agent does not matter - so long as there is enough is to shovel on a lot of fluxing agent, and then shovel on another few shovelfulls for luck.

This normally results in excessive consumption of the heat-exchange bodies. The lower slag volume that results in the operation of the cokeless cupola is not a problem in intermittent tapping and is certainly an advantage for slag disposal.

However, with continuous tapping we have found that this cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf slag volume can cause operational problems as the slag does not flow continuously from the front tapping and slagging box. This means that an operator continually has to release the slag by breaking the crust on the top of the box with a suitable bar, which is hot cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf heavy work.

According to a second aspect of the present invention we propose that if the slag volume is not sufficient to flow properly when required during tapping then a combination of limestone and silica is added to the charge to deliberately increase the volume so that the slag flows continuously and makes the operator's job easier.

This slag volume would then in many circumstances be similar to that in a conventional coke cupola. The most important aspect which highlights the invention is the use of refractory spheres in the cokeless cupola, as described in our British Patent Specification No. These spheres form an essential part of the operation, both technically and economically. The metal is pre-heated in the upper part of the furnace and melts just above the spheres; it is then superheated as it trickles down over the spheres.

The depth of the bed of cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf governs the amount of superheat and therefore the tapping temperature.

The flux additions must also melt above the bed and these additions are likewise superheated in passing down over the spheres. However, we have appreciated that the types of flux materials generally employed in order to produce a fluid slag also attack the spheres, and that it is very important to control the addition of fluxing agents. Generally limestone or dollastone is used as the fluxing material, or sometimes a vive tu vida marc anthony of the two.

If insufficient fluxing agents are added, the result is a slag which is viscous rather than fluid, and it does not flow easily through the spheres. Instead it tends to be held above them and it then builds up in a layer above the spheres. This can reach the point where, in a bad condition, the slag can be blown back up the furnace shaft, causing severe operational difficulties and in the worst case the melting of the metal ceases altogether as the metallic charge becomes coated with the viscous slag.

Thus cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf insufficient fluxing agents the furnace does not produce any metal at all. On the other hand, although we propose to add more fluxing material than is cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf, if too much fluxing material is added, with a view to keeping the slag fluid, the spheres will be attacked by the fluxing materials, leading to a high consumption of spheres which not only increases the operating cost but also, because of the reduced thickness of the bed as the spheres are consumed, leads to problems of insufficient superheating of the metal and consequently low tapping temperatures.

It is therefore very important to control the flux additions in order to obtain the correct consistency of the slag so that the furnace can operate smoothly, but at an economic cost. This control may involve deliberately increasing the volume of slag by suitable additions in order to operate a continuously tapped furnace smoothly. It is very difficult to take an analysis of the composition of the slag above the bed so the operator has to rely on the analysis of the slag after it has been removed from the furnace and after making certain assumptions regarding the amount of sand and dirt in the charge, as well as with regard to lining wear and rate of consumption of the spheres.

With these assumptions he can then calculate what changes must be made to the flux addition in order to obtain a fluid slag at the required tapping temperatures, yet, importantly, with minimum adverse effect on the spheres. It is obvious, therefore, that the required quantity and composition of the flux addition will vary for each operation of the cupola, the variables being the make-up of the charge, the type of lining, and the tapping temperature which will then latest kolkata bangla movie songs the rate of consumption of the spheres.

The flux addition will also depend on whether the furnace is to be tapped intermittently in which case a relatively low volume of slag can be handled, or is to be continuously tapped, in which case a higher slag volume is necessary for smooth operation. It is not cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf to achieve zero sphere consumption, but we have discovered that there is an optimum consumption for different modes of operation.

A typical slag analysis would have a composition in the following range: Broadly speaking, therefore, the invention is based on an appreciation of cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf importance of slag control in the operation of a cokeless cupola furnace with the minimum of trouble, cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf particular without problems originating from a slag which is too viscous, yet at minimum cost, that is to say, low sphere consumption and low lining wear. During continuous tapping the flow of slag from the furnace is continuous.

During intermittent tapping the slag is kept pent up in the furnace and is released only at intervals. In both cases when the slag flows it is sufficiently fluid to flow easily. This avoids handling difficulties. The lining may be consumable and may comprise a silica ganister, or for certain applications a lining with a high alumina content. In particular where the lining of the furnace has a significant alumina content problems of excessive viscosity in the slag are almost certain unless steps are taken to adjust the composition of the flux accordingly, primarily by the addition of lime and magnesia, but where these are already at an acceptable level, scrap glass or gravel or other predominantly silica-containing materials must be added; generally speaking a high alumina content, whether from the incoming charge, the furnace lining or the spheres, will cause a high viscosity high melting-point slag unless counteracted by the measures described.

Even where the metallic charge is known to be of pure metal free from dirt and sand, it is still essential to add fluxing agents to form a slag, if only to absorb the products of lining wear and sphere consumption. Another way of deliberately increasing the volume of slag in the furnace is to re-cycle the slag. It is of course known, and indeed normal, to adjust the composition of the incoming fluxing agents in the charge in a coke-fired cupola in order to keep the slag fluid; however in coke-fired cupolas this is no problem and simply involves the addition of more limestone because there is no heat-exchange bed to worry about.

Anyway in a coke-fired cupola the tapping temperature is higher, which means that if the slag composition is not quite right the extra temperature will still enable the slag to be removed quite easily. If more limestone were to be added in a cokeless cupola to maintain fluidity it would increase greatly the rate of consumption of the spheres, increasing the overall running costs as well as shortening the length of melting run that is possible.

Moreover, in a cokeless cupola slag control is much more critical because of the lower temperatures. Some examples will now be described to illustrate what can happen when a cokeless cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf is not run in accordance with the invention. The examples show the importance of slag control. In a cokeless cupola lined with a high alumina material, and operated for one week without repair although melting on only a single shift, the quantity jersey ac milan pes 6 cd-key dollastone added to take care of the dirt, and the products of wear on the spheres and the wear on the lining was of the order of 2 to 2.

It was found that the slag did not flow continuously and the operators had great difficulty in repeatedly opening the box to remove the slag. The melting point of the slag was barely higher than the tapping temperature phone number locator for android so with a small stream of slag the stream tended freeze off altogether and had to be re-started.

If the operators failed to clear the slag box at regular intervals the slag built up within the furnace to a point where it approached the area of the burners and was agitated into a foam which could rapidly increase in height and block the burners. The combination had a similar cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf to what had been used previously, i. This example shows, amongst other things, the importance of the slag having sufficient volume to flow during tapping, especially during continuous tapping.

A cokeless cupola operating with a clean charge and with what were mistakenly thought to be correct proportions in the charge including 12 Kg of dollastone per charge was found to exhibit very rapid consumption of the spheres, with the consequence that the bed almost vanished by the end of an eight-hour shift, resulting in insufficient superheating and low metal temperature.

This just goes to show that the "obvious" way of increasing slag volume - shovelling on several more shovels of limestone than is needed for our optimum method of operation results in excessive consumption of the spheres and subsequent decrease in the bed height and operational performance of the furnace.

Difficulties arose through bridging of the metal, and the slag was very sticky. Immediately the slag flowed with good mir 3 zentaur google and the bridging problem disappeared. The bridging was found to have been due to the sticky slag being thrown back up the shaft and coating the charge.

This illustrates the need to keep the slag sufficiently fluid to enable it to flow through the bed properly. All rights reserved. A SumoBrain Solutions Company. Login Sign up. Search Expert Search Quick Search. Method of operating cokeless cupola.

United States Patent The conventional operation of a cokeless cupola furnace has a requirement for a low volume of slag to be produced, because of the fact that there is no ash from coke to remove from the charge, and the fact that flux added to the charge to form slag eats away at the furnace lining, and at the bed of refractory spheres.

Running the furnace at low slag volumes makes the slag thick and can cause blockage of the slagging and tapping box. The invention adds more flux materials than is conventional, preferably including silica in cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf form of broken bottles, so as to deliberately increase the volume of slag, improving the flow.

Care cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf be taken not to add too much slag-forming materials. Taft, Richard T. Click for automatic bibliography generation. No translation available. We claim: A method according to claim 1 which further comprises the step of re-cycling slag removed from the furnace by re-introducing at least a portion of the slag as a component of the slag-forming fluxing agents.

A method according to claim 2 wherein limestone, dollastone is added to the re-cycled slag as another component of the fluxing agents. A method according to claim 1 wherein sufficient flux materials are added to the melt to keep the viscosity of the slag below a critical value at which point the slag tends cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf be held above the heat-exchange bodies and has difficulty in flowing through the bed.

A method according to claim 1 wherein silica cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf added to the charge as a fluxing agent. A method according to claim 6 wherein cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf silica comprises broken bottles, jars, gravel.

A method according to claim 1 wherein the furnace has a furnace lining which has a high alumina content. A method according to claim 11 which further comprises the step of re-cycling slag removed from the furnace by re-introducing at least a portion of the slag as a component of the slag-forming fluxing agents. A method according to claim 12 wherein limestone, dollastone is added to the re-cycled slag as another component of the fluxing agents. A method according to claim 11 wherein sufficient flux materials are added to the melt to keep the viscosity of the slag below a critical value at which point the slag tends to be held above the heat-exchange bodies and has difficulty in flowing through cm 01/02 atualizado 2012 toyota bed.

A method according to claim 11 wherein silica is added to the charge as a fluxing agent. A method according to claim 16 wherein the silica comprises broken bottles, jars, gravel. We have discovered that the cokeless cupola furnace operation pdf of slag control is of surprising importance.